Next Actions

Concrete steps likely to improve the next public THC review.

Resolve level cap: Core docs known to be stale.Regenerate local THC artifacts against the current public revision before using them as handoff evidence.

AI analysis note

What this means

The next-actions slice captures the ordered follow-up work derived from a THC review run. For ClearIntent at revision 52d0966, it lists five concrete items that must be completed to lift the review from THC-4 (local check) toward THC-5 (independently verified) or higher. Each item has an implicit dependency: transaction-backed autonomous execution evidence gates wallet-rendered signing evidence, both gate peer/public THC verification, and event authenticity hardening is a prerequisite for trusted leaderboard submission.

What is wrong

• The next-actions.json slice file exists as a path reference in the run directory but is not included verbatim in the bounded evidence package; a public reviewer cannot independently verify the item order, owner assignments, or completion criteria without fetching the file directly.
• The five listed actions are presented without public issue tracker references, ticket links, or OWNER file entries, so there is no traceable external path for a reviewer to confirm progress after the review date.
• Action 1 ('Capture one transaction-backed KeeperHub or executor receipt through the agent account path') has no external evidence link—no public Etherscan receipt, no Tenderly trace, no KeeperHub run page—making the gap unverifiable without re-running the demo live.
• Action 3 ('Request independent public or peer THC review') is listed as a follow-up but no public review request, GitHub issue, or external grading platform entry is linked, so the gap between local-only verification and third-party acceptance is a trust gap not a process gap.
• Action 5 ('Keep future THC-BOT runs appended instead of overwriting history') is an internal repo discipline note rather than a public verifiability claim, and the history ledger at THC-BOT.history.json shows only one run despite this guidance, indicating the discipline has not yet been applied.
• No priority, estimated effort, or milestone target dates are attached to any action, so the roadmap for lifting the level is not inspectable as public evidence.

The next-actions slice is well-structured as a raw artifact but functions as a private internal ledger when its contents are not fully embedded in the bounded evidence. The five actions correctly identify the real gating items—transaction receipt, wallet signing proof, independent review, event source hardening, and history append discipline—and they align with the hidden-trust and caps-applied slices. However, the slice cannot function as public truth without the actual next-actions.json file content and without external traceability for each action. The gap between these items being recorded internally and being publicly verifiable is itself the next hardening step: add issue tracker links or pull request references for each action, embed the next-actions.json verbatim in the run package, and link the independent review action to a live public grading submission or GitHub issue so reviewers can check progress. Until that boundary is crossed, the slice earns low clarity because its evidence is self-referential.

AI review providers can draft section notes, but deterministic THC scoring and caps remain authoritative.