Caps Applied

Deterministic level caps applied after scoring when evidence is missing, stale, or unverifiable.

Core docs known to be stale-1 pts

AI analysis note

What this means

The caps-applied slice documents explicit limitations and boundary conditions placed on ClearIntent's public evidence posture. It covers caps placed during THC review due to local-only evidence, missing live execution proof, incomplete wallet-rendered signing evidence, and the absence of independent public or peer verification. This slice defines what the project explicitly cannot claim at time of review.

What is wrong

• Caps-applied.json file content not included in bounded evidence; slice completeness must be inferred from LOCAL_CHECK.md and README.md capability boundaries.
• No independent public THC review has been conducted; all caps are first-party self-assigned.
• No transaction-backed autonomous execution receipt is recorded; execution adapter caps at `keeperhub-live-submitted` workflow proof without transaction hash.
• Real wallet-rendered EIP-712/ERC-7730 signing evidence remains incomplete; signer adapter caps at local fixture proof only.
• ENS identity binding is limited to `guardian.agent.clearintent.eth` with no public npm release to validate agent SDK handoff boundary.
• 0G live-write depends on operator-held credentials not verifiable by public reviewers without private credential access.

The caps-applied slice correctly identifies ClearIntent's evidence boundary: local-fixture proof without transaction-backed execution, no real wallet signing render, and no independent public verification. The README.md capability snapshot provides legible caps in table form, and LOCAL_CHECK.md summarizes local-only, missing-live-evidence, and transaction-gaps caps. However, the actual caps-applied.json file content is not present in the bounded evidence, preventing direct inspection of cap categorization, severity, or enforcement metadata. Public reviewers cannot verify cap completeness or check whether additional undeclared gaps exist without the slice file itself. The slice captures the right concept but the artifact is missing from the provided bounded evidence.

AI review providers can draft section notes, but deterministic THC scoring and caps remain authoritative.