Truth / 30
StrongExplicit claims, public source of truth, boundaries, assumptions, and evidence trail.
Methodology folder page
Truth, Hardening, and Clarity are evidence categories. The public level is computed from score, then constrained by deterministic caps.
The base score is built from four documented evidence categories.
Explicit claims, public source of truth, boundaries, assumptions, and evidence trail.
Validation commands, tests, CI, failure modes, environment notes, and guardrails.
Fresh-clone setup, contributor guidance, operator docs, recovery notes, and navigation.
Changelog, decisions, known risks, uncertainty, and prior review trail.
The score maps to a THC level before cap logic is applied.
Insufficient public evidence or major trust gaps remain.
The repo explains itself, but hardening evidence may still be thin.
Validation and operational guardrails are visible enough to score.
A reviewer can follow the repo, evidence, and decisions from public state.
Setup and checks are strong enough for repeatable public review.
High score plus no unresolved cap blockers under the methodology.
Caps lower the recommended level when evidence is missing, stale, private, or unverifiable.
Caps level because reviewers cannot reproduce basic orientation.
Caps level when tests/CI/commands are absent or unverifiable.
Local THC files point at a different revision than public review.
Private dashboards or maintainer memory cannot earn public score credit.
Reports are review artifacts only. They are not security approval, production readiness, endorsement, or a reliability guarantee.
Missing setup, missing validation, stale artifacts, or unverifiable claims can cap the public level after scoring.
Stars, maintainer reputation, package size, polish, or brand awareness do not increase THC score.
The best reports show a clean trail from claim, to file, to command, to decision history, all at the reviewed commit.